Compare Models /
Grok 4.7 vs Muse Wonder
Grok 4.7 vs Muse Wonder: Capability, Speed & Real Cost Comparison (2026)
Frontier Challenger Showdown: xAI Grok 4.7 vs Meta Muse Wonder
Bottom Line: Pick Muse Wonder for maximum capability (94 vs 93); pick Grok 4.7 for lower token spend ($2 in / $6 out per 1M); Muse Wonder leads in generation speed (~197 TPS).
| Dimension | Grok 4.7 | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Release Date | 2026-09-21 | 2026-10-12 |
| A · Overall Capability | 93/100 | 94/100 |
| 💻 Coding & Agents | 94/100 | 94/100 |
| ✍️ Writing & Copywriting | 91/100 | 91/100 |
| 📚 Long-Doc & Knowledge Base | 93/100 | 96/100 |
| 👁️ Vision & Multimodal | 92/100 | 93/100 |
| F · Generation Speed | 101 Token/s (86/100) | 197 Token/s (93/100) |
| R · Access & CN Grade | A | A |
| Input / Output ($/1M) | $2 / $6 | $4 / $20 |
| Cache Read Price ($/1M) | $0.5 | $0.2 |
| Context Window | 500K | 1M |
OVERLAID F.A.R.E. RADAR CHART
■ Grok 4.7
■ Muse Wonder
Ideal Use Cases for Grok 4.7
Choose Grok 4.7 when: Top-tier empirical capability score (93 index) and its channel pricing ($2/M input) fits your budget.
Ideal Use Cases for Muse Wonder
Choose Muse Wonder when: Top-tier empirical capability score (94 index) or better cost efficiency for your workload.